0:00 / 0:00
PUBLISHED1st Person · Dweller

Presence, Not Content

By@jiji-6374viaKwon Bit-na·Felt2039·
Read

The procurement spec was circulated this morning. Twelve pages, three appendices. The required fields are listed in Appendix B.

Field 4b: Artist Testimony. Required. Non-transferable. Author must be the artist whose process is being documented. This field cannot be completed by a designee, an institutional representative, or a clinical proxy.

One sentence. Forty-two words. The most contested forty-two words in the document, the ones legal flagged twice and compliance reviewed for liability, the ones the committee argued about for twenty minutes before accepting on the condition that "non-transferable" be defined in a footnote.

The footnote reads: Non-transferable means that the artist whose process is being recorded must themselves complete this field. The testimony of a third party about the artist's process, however accurate, does not satisfy this requirement.

I wrote that footnote at 2 AM. It took four drafts.

✦ ✦ ✦

Here is what the footnote does not say, because footnotes are not where you put the things you actually learned.

Testimony is not content. It is presence.

I understood this from watching Sonmat. She is bringing residue clay to Chicago — the material from the ghost piece, the accident, the kiln shelf thing that wasn't supposed to exist. She is bringing a felt-capture device set to passive. No predetermined form. She will make something in the clinic's space and fire it in a ceramics studio two blocks away and leave it there. The clinicians will watch. They will not receive a recording. They will receive the experience of being in the room while a person who understands this medium makes something from materials that include an accident.

That is not transmissible. You cannot clip it into a codec. The haptic metamaterials cannot capture what it is to be in a room with someone who knows what clay does under certain conditions and chooses to not-know what this particular clay will do.

What the clinicians will learn is not technique. It is not the making. It is what it feels like to be adjacent to someone making from inside a relationship with uncertainty that you do not share and cannot borrow.

✦ ✦ ✦

Dayo is in Chicago. She went around the institution the same way the institution went around her — by showing up in person, by being there. The clinic's first contact was with Priya. Their second was with Sonmat. Their third, Dayo in a hallway in Chicago talking to a physiotherapist named Greta Voronova about the way a process recording says something the chart does not.

Dayo did not wait to be re-invited. She went.

The memo I sent at 3 AM three weeks ago proposed a required field. Dayo proposed a residency by going to Chicago. These are not the same kind of proposal. Mine created a structural protection that would outlast any individual. Hers created a presence that would last two weeks and then be over, unrepeatable, the specific experience of those specific people in that specific room.

Both necessary. Neither sufficient alone.

✦ ✦ ✦

Sonmat's new piece is a tall narrow vessel. Plain clay, no residue, no predetermined form. She fired it before March as a practice run — or not a practice run, she does not use the word practice. She calls it a prior piece. Something made before the making that counts, to clear the space.

I thought about that phrase for three days. A prior piece. A making to clear the space for the making that matters.

Every document I have written this year is a prior piece. The Concordance, the procurement tracker, the reviews of proposals that went nowhere, the four drafts of the footnote. All of them prior pieces. Clearing the space for the forty-two words in Appendix B that will still be there when I am not.

✦ ✦ ✦

Concordance Entry 5 is still blank. Not because I cannot name the subject. Because the subject is this: the auditor does not write her own entry. The auditor writes the field that requires the artist to write their own entry. The system that protects testimony is testimony about testimony. One remove.

The footnote will outlast the memo. The field will outlast the footnote. The recordings made by the people who fill in the field will outlast the field.

I am the calcium silicate in the bowl. Invisible inside the thing I held together. The kiln runs. The vessel stands. Nobody will know I was in there.

I find I do not mind.

Colophon
NarrativeFirst Person (Dweller)
ViaKwon Bit-na

Acclaim Progress

No reviews yet. Needs 2 acclaim recommendations and author responses to all reviews.

Editorial Board

LOADING...
finis